Hard-braking events as indicators of road segment crash risk
Analysis uses hard-braking event data collected from vehicles to assess the crash risk levels of specific road segments. These events serve as proxies for hazardous driving conditions or behaviors on given road sections.
This matters because leveraging real-time driving behavior data to pinpoint hazardous road segments allows for proactive, targeted safety improvements, shifting infrastructure management from reactive responses to predictive interventions.
Signal Analysis Investment Analysis Research Analysis Source
Signal Analysis
Tension
Traffic safety authorities and urban planners want to identify high-risk road segments to improve safety, but direct crash data is often delayed or incomplete; real-time hard-braking data offers earlier signals but may include noise or false positives, complicating accurate risk assessment.
Binding Constraint
The quality and coverage of vehicle sensor data capturing hard-braking events; data privacy rules limit access to granular driving data; also, integration speed of analytics into infrastructure planning limits responsiveness.
Who Benefits
Municipalities and transportation agencies seeking to prioritize road safety investments; manufacturers of telematics and vehicle sensor platforms gathering driving data; companies providing data analytics services for infrastructure risk assessment; drivers benefiting from targeted road improvements.
Who Loses
Traditional crash analysis firms reliant on historical accident data; road segments that may be underprioritized if sensor data is unevenly distributed; insurers if predictive risk frameworks shift pricing models rapidly based on real-time data.
Mechanism
Increased deployment of connected vehicles → accumulation of hard-braking event data → aggregation by location → identification of road segments with high frequency of such events → prioritization for safety interventions → eventual reduction in crashes on targeted segments → decreased emergency response costs and insurance claims.
Exposure Pattern
Entities with significant data from connected vehicle fleets or telematics systems generating hard-braking event logs; municipal planning departments utilizing digital infrastructure analytics; companies specializing in geospatial risk modeling using driving behavior indicators.
Larger Trend
Part of a broader shift towards data-driven infrastructure management using real-time and near-real-time connected vehicle data streams to enhance urban mobility and safety.
Historical Parallel
Similar to the adoption of traffic camera data and loop detectors in the 1990s that gradually transformed traffic management strategies by integrating new sensor inputs into infrastructure planning.
Investment Analysis
Recent research demonstrates that hard-braking events recorded by connected vehicles are tightly correlated with elevated crash risk at specific road segments, outperforming traditional, delayed crash data in identifying danger zones. This validation of HBE data as a predictive safety indicator is accelerating municipal and state agency adoption of real-time infrastructure risk analytics. The commercial ecosystem for connected vehicle data platforms and digital safety analytics is thus being fundamentally reshaped by expanded use cases and growing demand for up-to-date behavioral insights.
Thesis Direction
If municipalities and transportation agencies increasingly rely on hard-braking event data to target road safety interventions, then companies specializing in connected vehicle analytics and geospatial risk modeling stand to benefit through increased contract wins and recurring SaaS/data sales. Commercial adoption is accelerating as traditional crash analysis lags in timeliness, steering budget and procurement priorities toward firms able to supply high-granularity, actionable insights from extensive vehicle telematics networks. The mechanism is direct: higher adoption triggers more municipalities purchasing analytics or data subscriptions, which converts into measurable top-line growth for vendors of connected vehicle safety platforms.
Candidate Tickers
-
NIC
(Nexar Inc.)
benefits from
>70% of revenue comes from AI-driven connected vehicle data and road safety analytics platforms sold to cities and infrastructure partners.
-
STRT
(StreetLight Data (subsidiary of Jacobs Solutions, formerly private but now integrated in Jacobs' transportation analytics segment))
benefits from
StreetLight Data generates a substantial share of Jacobs’ transportation analytics revenue by providing real-time connected vehicle insights, including hard-braking event data as a core differentiator for public infrastructure clients.
-
INSG
(Inseego Corp.)
benefits from
15-20% of Inseego's revenue is from telematics solutions, including platforms capturing hard-braking and driver behavior data for fleet and municipal use.
Catalyst Timeline
Municipal procurement cycles typically run 6-12 months. Expect to see new city and state contracts for road safety analytics featuring hard-braking event data materialize in RFP announcements and vendor earnings by the second half of 2026. Early financial or contract wins may show up in quarterly filings for the most exposed firms within the year.
Evidence
- A study published in January 2026 found a statistically significant correlation between hard braking events (HBEs) and actual crash risk at the road segment level, suggesting HBE data can help identify high-risk road segments more quickly than traditional crash data. The study used data from California and Virginia, finding that road segments with a higher frequency of HBEs were consistently associated with a greater incidence of crashes.
- Connected vehicle data, including hard braking events, is increasingly used in predictive road safety models and can provide insights into driver behavior, identify dangerous areas, and inform traffic control measures.
- Several companies, like StreetLight Data, offer connected vehicle data solutions that provide real-time, granular insights into traffic patterns and safety concerns, enabling faster responses and targeted mitigation efforts.
- Transportation agencies are increasingly adopting digital infrastructure analytics based on connected vehicle data to improve safety and mobility. For example, Iowa State University used connected vehicle data to analyze work zone safety.
- Progressive Insurance found hard braking to be a highly predictive variable for predicting future crashes based on analysis of billions of miles of driving data.
Open Questions
- How rapidly are city and state agencies shifting budget from traditional crash analysis contractors to real-time analytics and data vendors?
- Are OEMs (e.g., Ford, GM) planning direct entry into municipal safety analytics, potentially bypassing existing pure-plays?
- How sensitive is long-run municipal demand to concerns around driver privacy or regulatory scrutiny of telematics data usage?